From this piece of reading, I found many things to note down. For example;
*Concerning narrative, it needs to have a beginning, a middle and an end, and these have to make sense to the audience and through out own experiences, we can understand these meanings.
*The conventions of a narrative include the genre, the character, the form and the time.
Bartne's Code
This is like unravelling a piece of wool in that as we identify with the narrative codes, we are able to understand the meaning.
Structures
*Tvzetsh Tadorov talked about equilibrium, disequilibrium and a new equilibrium. This is where the character starts off normally, equilibrium, then is faced with a problem, disequilibrium, and they work it out and have a new ending, new equilibrium.
*Vladimir Propp talked about characters and actions
*Claude Levi-strauss talked about the conflict and oppositions with the character.
I think these are definitely relivent for today, as they are the structures that make a film, and it is how everyone has grown up knowing how to recognise these; people do not like change in such a big way that they will not enjoy it.
As an audience of course we have a say in the way we read the narrative, as we all read things differently, and as mentioned earlier, through our own experiences, we would interpret aspects differently than others.
Think about the theory surrounding narrative and consider if you think the ideas are appropriate to apply to todays stories, does it matter? As a audience do we not have a say in the reading of the narrative?
ReplyDelete